Pre-Money vs Post-Money Valuation: What Founders Need to Know
Last Updated on 21/09/2026 by Damin Murdock Understanding pre-money vs post-money valuation is essential for founders raising capital through a Simple Agreement for Future Equity
Joint ventures combine the strengths of two or more parties to pursue a shared commercial goal. Getting the agreement right before the venture starts is what protects each party’s contribution, profit share and exit rights when circumstances change.
Send an enquiry




A joint venture allows two or more parties to pool resources, expertise, or capital for a specific commercial purpose without merging their businesses entirely. Whether it is a property development, a technology co-development, or a government tender bid, each party brings something to the table and expects something in return. Without a properly drafted agreement, that exchange is open to dispute.
At Leo Lawyers, we draft and advise on both contractual and incorporated joint ventures, ensuring each party’s contributions, profit-sharing entitlements, decision-making rights, and exit strategy are clearly documented. We also advise on competition law obligations under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth). This can apply to joint ventures between competing businesses.
Over 18 Years of Experience in Commercial Law and Corporate Structuring
Damin Murdock has advised businesses and investors on joint venture arrangements across property development, technology, professional services and commercial construction. He has drafted agreements from the initial heads of agreement stage through to execution and has advised clients on disputes that arose because the original arrangement was never properly documented.
Damin understands that a joint venture succeeds or fails on the strength of the agreement behind it. His approach is to address every scenario the arrangement may face before it arises, not after the relationship has broken down and both parties are arguing over what was agreed.
I highly recommend Leo Lawyers Pty Limited, particularly Damin Murdock. Damin is exceptional when it comes to employment law and has a deep understanding of the nuances surrounding unfair dismissal and adverse action matters.
What really stands out is his command of the legislation and case law. He has an extraordinary memory for legal provisions and clauses, and can recall and apply them with a level of precision that is genuinely impressive — even in an age where so many people rely heavily on AI and search tools.
Damin combines strong technical knowledge with practical, clear advice and a genuine understanding of the complexities involved in employment disputes. An outstanding employment lawyer and a real asset to Leo Lawyers.
I cannot recommend Leo Lawyers highly enough. From the very beginning, the team was professional, responsive, and genuinely committed to achieving the best possible outcome.
A special thank you to Principal Lawyer Damin Murdock, whose expertise, strategic advice, and unwavering support throughout the process were exceptional. Damin took the time to clearly explain every step, provided practical and honest guidance, and consistently demonstrated a deep knowledge of the law. What stood out most was his ability to combine technical expertise with genuine care and understanding, giving me complete confidence during a challenging time.
We draft bespoke joint venture agreements covering the scope of the venture, each party’s contributions, profit-sharing, decision-making, exit rights, and dispute resolution. We do not strip back recycled precedents. We draft from the commercial terms the parties actually agreed and build forward from there.
A contractual joint venture is governed entirely by agreement, with no separate legal entity created. An incorporated joint venture establishes a new company under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), with the agreement taking the form of a shareholders agreement. The right choice depends on tax position, the scale and duration of the venture, and each party’s appetite for liability exposure.
Property joint ventures are among the most common structures in NSW, typically a landowner contributing the site and a developer contributing expertise and funding, with profits divided on completion. The agreement must address financing, approval risk, cost overruns, and what happens if the project is delayed or does not proceed.
Technology joint ventures raise complex questions about who owns the IP created during the venture and what happens to it on exit. We advise on ownership, licensing within the venture, pre-existing IP each party contributes, and the restrictions each party faces using jointly developed IP once the venture ends.
A joint venture without clear governance is a deadlock waiting to happen. We draft provisions covering board or management committee structure, voting rights, reserved matters requiring unanimous consent, and deadlock resolution. Where one party operates the venture, we document their authority, reporting obligations, and the grounds for removal.
Every joint venture needs a defined exit strategy. We draft provisions covering early exit, pre-emptive rights over a departing party’s interest, and the valuation mechanism for a buy-out. We also address what happens to shared assets, IP, and ongoing contracts when the venture terminates.
Get the structure and the agreement right before the project begins.
This is the first question any joint venture lawyer in Sydney should ask. The answer shapes every clause that follows. The two structures carry different legal, tax and liability consequences, and what works for one transaction may be entirely wrong for another.
In a contractual joint venture, the parties enter into an agreement directly with each other. No new entity is created. Each party retains its separate legal identity, holds its own assets and is responsible for its own tax position. The joint venture agreement governs the entire relationship. This structure suits shorter-term projects, smaller ventures and arrangements where the parties want to avoid the cost and complexity of maintaining a separate company. The primary risk is that the boundaries of each party’s liability depend entirely on what the agreement says.
In an incorporated joint venture, a new company is established under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to carry out the venture. The parties become shareholders in that company. The joint venture agreement takes the form of a shareholders agreement governing the relationship between them. This structure provides clearer separation of liability, can simplify third-party contracting and is often preferred for larger or longer-term projects. It introduces additional governance obligations under the Corporations Act and has tax implications that need to be considered before the structure is chosen.
Joint ventures between competing businesses may require analysis under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth). Where the arrangement involves price coordination, market allocation or output restriction between competitors, it may engage the cartel conduct provisions of the Act even if the parties’ primary intention is collaborative rather than anti-competitive. The ACCC has the power to authorise joint venture arrangements that satisfy the public benefit test. We advise on whether a proposed joint venture raises competition law concerns before the agreement is executed
| Feature | Contractual JV | Incorporated JV |
|---|---|---|
| Separate legal entity | No | Yes - new company under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) |
| Liability separation | Depends on agreement terms | Clearer - company assets separate from party assets |
| Taxation | Each party taxed separately | Company taxed, distributions subject to dividend rules |
| Governance | Governed by JV agreement only | Corporations Act plus JV / shareholders agreement |
| Setup cost and complexity | Lower | Higher - ASIC registration, ongoing compliance |
| IP ownership | Defined by agreement | Held by the joint venture company |
| Best suited for | Shorter term or smaller projects | Larger, longer-term, or higher-risk ventures |
Joint ventures require specialised market knowledge to be effective. We draft and negotiate joint venture agreements in Australia across the most capital-intensive and fast-moving sectors.
We execute complex corporate alliances with clear timelines and commercial precision so your project is not stalled by legal delays.
(1 to 2 Days)
(1 to 2 Days)
(1 to 2 Days)
(7 to 14 Days)
(1 to 2 Days)
(1 to 2 Days)
Our joint venture agreement lawyers in Sydney act for businesses and individuals entering joint venture arrangements across a range of industries and transaction types. We act for both sides of the arrangement, advising each party on its rights and obligations before any documents are signed.
Book a consultation with Damin Murdock today.
Last Updated on 21/09/2026 by Damin Murdock Understanding pre-money vs post-money valuation is essential for founders raising capital through a Simple Agreement for Future Equity
Last Updated on 02/09/2026 by Damin Murdock Misleading or deceptive conduct claims under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) are a common feature of commercial disputes,
Last Updated on 02/09/2026 by Damin Murdock and Nohra Chalouhi Start-ups and closely held proprietary companies often need to issue shares quickly, whether to bring in investors,
Last Updated on 02/09/2026 by Damin Murdock and Nohra Chalouhi One of the fundamental duties imposed on company directors is to prevent a company from incurring debts
Last Updated on 02/09/2026 by Damin Murdock Entering into commercial contracts, although essential to businesses, has to be done with a risk management lens. Rushed
Last Updated on 02/09/2026 by Damin Murdock When structuring shareholder arrangements in an Australian company, especially startups and private entities, it’s crucial to protect the
Leo Lawyers is built on the foundation of delivering legal excellence and outcomes, hence the name LEO.
Copyright © 2026 Leo Lawyers | ABN 39 686 344 196 | All Rights Reserved | Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.